Skip to main content

Why I'm here (this blog's raison d'etre) - Part II (of II)

Is everything as it's always been? I touched on this point last week. American political life has from its very beginnings been filled with animus and rancor. The election of 1800, pitting John Adams against Thomas Jefferson, two American icons, was filled with the very worst tactics of political campaigning: mud-slinging, backstabbing, and scare-mongering, making it not much different from the American presidential elections of the 21st century. The election of 1824 between John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson was a particularly nasty affair, featuring all sorts of slanders and outrageous fabrications.

This thought reminds me of an op-ed written by a conservative columnist years ago, in which he argued that the voting patterns in Tennessee in the 19th century were basically the same as they are today. The gist of his argument was there's nothing to be improved upon and we should be content with the way things are (since that's the way it's always been).

So, there you have it.

I start today with the reminder that we should not allow ourselves to be duped by the particular historical moment in which we live, thinking that something we are currently experiencing is novel, unique and never been done before. Perhaps it is novel for us, but not for humankind in general. With this context in mind, we can nevertheless state with some confidence that we also live in an age of great change. One need look no further than the technological advances in nearly every field of our lives that have taken place just in the past decade to demonstrate that things are in permanent flux.

That being said, I feel justified in suggesting that our current political malaise is something new. The state of political and social discourse has disintegrated perceptively over the past 10 years. Everyone is enraged about something. What's worse? Our political representatives seems to be contributing to it, instead of acting as voices of reason or setting a standard of behavior that we should want to aspire to (or at the very least, be proud of). When's the last time you were proud of a politician? Think about that one, we'll be doing a poll in the near future.

Rules of the blog: The only thing I ask of my readers and contributors is that they leave their name, city, and state with their comments. I do this first and foremost to promulgate good ideas and share them with others, giving credit where credit is due. I also insist that we do observe a certain level of civility in our dialog, a standard anticipated by the first commentator last week. Therefore, I expect everyone to conduct themselves like polite adults. I will be deleting anonymous postings and profanity as soon as I see them. Do you have your nose out of joint because you feel like it's your right to express yourself as you see fit? Good. We'll be talking about that, too.

As a final note for today, please remember that we celebrate one of this country's least-known holidays this coming week. Flag Day, on 14 June, commemorates the adaption of the flag of the United States on 14 June 1777. That means our flag will be 240 years old on Wednesday. Perhaps you will honor the day with a donation to Liberty's Promise, my organization that helps immigrant youth learn about American civic life. You can donate using the button at the top of the page or the button the scroll bar to your right. It would be a great gesture on behalf of our next generation of new American citizens. We would greatly appreciate your support. Thank you!


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Hello, my fellow bloggers! I'm new at this, so I would like to ask you cut me a little slack. I am from Woodville, RI, where it's dark and quiet-just the way I like it. I deleted my comment of a few minutes ago because , well, I didn't like it. Indeed, the Presidential election was much more contentious than I have ever experienced and I think that holds true for just about everybody. Well, we have something in common already. Great! But, as mentioned by our host commenting on a written article, we shouldn't expect anything different because it has always been this way. Well, maybe because it's been tolerated, in some cases encouraged, all these years. And, of course one side always points the finger at the other and screams "It's THEIR fault" or "Their doing it ,too" Maybe WE need to demand better. I won't pretend to know how to do this and it wouldn't happen overnight even I did. I can't help but possibly that someone, or some group WANTS us to be in this melee. Just a thought from off the cuff. I any event, I would like to thank Bob P. for his reminder on Flag Day. May we all fly it proudly and with patriotism in all its' many and diverse forms. I expect some will fly it upside down (a signal of distress dating from WW2, I believe) and some will burn it which upsets me very much. However, I won't tell anyone they can do neither because it is YOUR and MY right to free expression. Isn't that what this blog is supposed to be about? Here's hoping this blog great success via quality discussion amoung civil citizens of our great nation!

  3. I should re-phrase and make it clear our host DID NOT suggest we should expect no better in our elective process and was referencing an article written by a wholly different individual. I apologize for any confusion.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

We should be reading the Westerly Sun (Part I of II)

I suspect that Eliot White will be pleased with the title of this post. Mr. White, the publisher of the Sun, as well as the Meriden Record-Journal in Central Connecticut, is a bit of a rarity in modern America. He is the publisher of a family-owned newspaper, among just a handful of folks in the United States still to do so. This is too bad. Newspapers published by people who have a vital interest in their local community are the first thing you should be reading. Here are four reasons why:

1)  They are less likely to have an agenda that you can't readily suss out. Put differently, if they do have a secret agenda (for example, "that guy at the Sun really wants to get a casino in town,") chances are it will become apparent. A local paper can end up with a credibility problem if it pushes an agenda.

2)  They put local perspective on national issues. How does the recent tax legislation affect local businesses? What do changes in healthcare legislation mean for local healthc…

George Towery -- An American Hero

A couple of weeks ago, Northern Virginia lost a man of great decency and dignity in George Towery. I knew George since 2011, when we hired him to serve as a facilitator in our after-school program of civic engagement for low-income, immigrant youth at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, VA. George was the anchor of that program as he later came to be at our Wakefield High School in Arlington, VA. His relationships with our teenage participants, everyone of whom he knew by name, was based on his profound respect for the individual and his high regard for basic human dignity. In return, the youth respected and admired him, treating him as a surrogate grandfather. He was the classic example of intergenerational bonding at its best.

There was an obvious reason for this. George was a lifelong educator. Before he retired from Fairfax County Public Schools in 2010, George served as the principal at Cameron Elementary School for 30 years and before that he was the principal of Lorton Ele…

Let's all remember our John Locke

Yes, it's seventeenth century time. Back in 1689, the English philosopher John Locke published his two Treatises of Government. I bring up a writer who's been dead for more than 300 years because I believe that his understanding of government is more relevant today than ever. For those of you who care, Locke has recently come into the limelight as the result of Steven Pinker's new book on the Enlightenment and the resulting criticisms of it (one, in fact, in last week's Wall Street Journal). I'm happy to go into this in more detail if you would care to do so. For the moment, however, let's stick to Locke's essays and their current relevance.

Ok, so way back when, Locke argued that human beings, whereas they may have tendencies to selfishness and egotism, are generally reasonable, endowed with goodwill toward others. In other words, like you and I think of ourselves. This being so, people established governments to cooperate with each other and facilitate so…